Against Decay: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{TTP2Document | file = Against_Decay | title = Against Decay | loc = RINTRAH }} From Selected Archive Documents (A-C): We live in a decaying system, which in turn produces ideologies of decay to justify its existence. No matter what cultural signifiers they get packaged with, these ideologies come down to the same material result: a future in which for the average person there is less of everything. To paraphrase Mark Fisher, we find it easier to imagine the decl..." |
RichouHunter (talk | contribs) Added hex string, links |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
No matter what cultural signifiers they get packaged with, these ideologies come down to the same material result: a future in which for the average person there is less of everything. To paraphrase Mark Fisher, we find it easier to imagine the decline of civilization than to imagine a civilization worth living in. | No matter what cultural signifiers they get packaged with, these ideologies come down to the same material result: a future in which for the average person there is less of everything. To paraphrase Mark Fisher, we find it easier to imagine the decline of civilization than to imagine a civilization worth living in. | ||
5768792073686f756c642074686520736361 6c6573206f6620676f6f6420616e642065766 96c2062652062616c616e6365643f | {{HexString|5768792073686f756c642074686520736361 6c6573206f6620676f6f6420616e642065766 96c2062652062616c616e6365643f|Why should the scales of good and evil be balanced?}} | ||
Those of us who still believe that humanity can thrive, that there is a path forward other than wilful or accidental decay, are out of sync with the system. No matter how we phrase our arguments, they will be perceived in terms of whatever cultural signifiers the listener opposes. | Those of us who still believe that humanity can thrive, that there is a path forward other than wilful or accidental decay, are out of sync with the system. No matter how we phrase our arguments, they will be perceived in terms of whatever cultural signifiers the listener opposes. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{Document Comments | {{Document Comments | ||
| author1 = Athena: | | author1 = [[Athena]]: | ||
| comment1 = This was written only a few months before the discovery of the virus. There was no time for conditions to change. | | comment1 = This was written only a few months before the discovery of the virus. There was no time for conditions to change. | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:TTP2 Documents]] | [[Category:TTP2 Documents]] | ||
[[Category:TTP2]] | [[Category:TTP2]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:52, 28 November 2023
Against_Decay is a text document stored in the RINTRAH terminal.
Contents
Against Decay
From Selected Archive Documents (A-C):
We live in a decaying system, which in turn produces ideologies of decay to justify its existence.
No matter what cultural signifiers they get packaged with, these ideologies come down to the same material result: a future in which for the average person there is less of everything. To paraphrase Mark Fisher, we find it easier to imagine the decline of civilization than to imagine a civilization worth living in.
5768792073686f756c642074686520736361 6c6573206f6620676f6f6420616e642065766 96c2062652062616c616e6365643f
Those of us who still believe that humanity can thrive, that there is a path forward other than wilful or accidental decay, are out of sync with the system. No matter how we phrase our arguments, they will be perceived in terms of whatever cultural signifiers the listener opposes.
It's a deeply frustrating, depressing, even infuriating situation. But what can we do except patiently explain, and hope conditions change? In other words, what can we do except have faith?
Comments
| Athena: This was written only a few months before the discovery of the virus. There was no time for conditions to change. |