View source for Athena History

{{TTP2Document
| file = Athena_History
| title = The History of Athena
| loc = [[RINTRAH]]
}}

{{HexString|46726569686569742069737420696|Freiheit ist i}} was first published as ''Athena: A Novel'', and retained that title for its first three printings (now highly sought-after). After a lull in popularity, it was reprinted as ''Athena Reborn: A Novel''; this edition retained the same text, but included some of the author's poetry.

The next edition, however, published long after the author's death under the rather embarrassing title Athena's Truth, included severe cuts and drastic changes to the text "in the interest of updating it for modern audiences." This particularly affected the last chapter, Anthropogony, which the editors accused of "scientism and human supremacy."

Science wunderkind [[Alexandra Drennan]] was one of the few to come to the novel's defense, writing in a long essay that the novel's "clear-eyed belief in the value of Athena's journey towards humanity" had been essential to shaping her own views, encouraging her to pursue science as a vocation rather than a career, and that changing the text constituted an attack on the author's unique artistic and philosophical vision.

"Alex who hurt you?? Imao" one of the editors commented on a popular social media platform.

[[Nadya Sarabhai]] of the [[Institute for Applied Noematics]] also got involved in the discussion, backing Drennan, resulting in a long but unsuccessful campaign to oust Sarabhai from her position as head researcher {{HexString|d6d657220467265|mmer Fre}}

{{HexString|69686569742064657320616e646572732044656e6b656e64656 e2e204e6963687420776567656e206465732046616e617469736d75732064657220e2809e4765726563687469676b656974e2809c2c20736f6e6465726e207765696c20616c6c206461732042656c656872656e64652c204865696c73616d6520756e64205265|iheit des anders Denkenden. Nicht wegen des Fanatismus der »Gerechtigkeit« sondern weil all das Belehrende, Heilsame und Re}}

{{HexString|696e6967656e6465206465|inigende de}} in the current context of ecological catastrophe, as evidenced by the recent extinction of the orangutan. Clumsy editing aside, do the critics of the novel perhaps have a point after all? Is a philosophy that places humans above Nature, and sees science and technology as the only valid tools, the cause of all our troubles? What about other ways of knowing, other ways of living?

{{HexString|7220706f6c697469736368656e20467265696865697420616e2064696573656d20576573656e2068c3a46e677420756e64207365696e65205769726b756e6720766572736167742c2077656e6e2064696520e2809e4672656968656974e2809c207a756d2050726976696c656769756d20776972642e|r politischen Freiheit an diesem Wesen hangt und seine Wirkung versagt, wenn die »Freiheit« zum Privilegium wird.}}

== Notes ==

The reconstructed hex strings read:

<blockquote>
Freiheit ist immer Freiheit des anders Denkenden. Nicht wegen des Fanatismus der »Gerechtigkeit« sondern weil all das Belehrende, Heilsame und Rer politischen Freiheit an diesem Wesen hangt und seine Wirkung versagt, wenn die »Freiheit« zum Privilegium wird.

Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently. Not because of any fanatical concept of "justice" but because all that is instructive, wholesome and purifying in political freedom depends on this essential characteristic, and its effectiveness vanishes when "freedom" becomes a special privilege.
</blockquote>

This quote is attributed to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa_Luxemburg Rosa Luxemburg], a Polish-German socialist and anti-war activist.

[[Category:TTP2 Documents]]
[[Category:TTP2]]